The Stories
Story 02 of 10
The Courtship of Mr Lyon
The gentler of Carter’s two versions of Beauty and the Beast, and the more unsettling for being gentle. It is told in the third person, which is not an accident but an argument: Beauty never quite narrates her own story, and Carter uses that distance to ask whether a rescue that ends in a comfortable marriage is a liberation at all, or only a softer, warmer cage.
The story
A merchant, newly ruined, breaks down in the snow on his way home and takes shelter at a mysterious mansion whose owner, the Beast, is a lion who walks upright and wears a smoking jacket. Leaving, the merchant plucks a single white rose for his daughter Beauty, the one gift she asked for; the Beast appears in a fury, then relents on one condition, that Beauty should come and dine with him. She goes out of love and duty. The shy, lonely Beast is charmed by her, and offers to help her father recover his fortune through the courts if she will stay a while.
Beauty travels to London with her restored father and slips into the life of a pampered society girl, growing a little vain and forgetting her promise to return. The Beast, pining, begins to die. Warned by his spaniel, Beauty rushes back to find him ‘sadly diminished’ and near death. Her tears and her declared love transform him: he becomes a man, though a strikingly ordinary one, with an unkempt mane and a boxer’s broken nose. They marry, and the story closes on the almost suspiciously domestic image of the pair walking in the garden.
A closer look
Reworking Beauty and the Beast: the third person as a cage
Carter draws here on the polite eighteenth-century fairy tale of Madame Leprince de Beaumont, and on Jean Cocteau’s dreamlike 1946 film, both of which she knew well. Marina Warner notes that Carter wanted us to ‘feel what it is like to be Beauty from the inside’, yet the striking choice here is that she narrates this Beauty from the outside, in the third person. Chris Power puts it sharply: the name Beauty ‘diminishes her to a single attribute of male-determined value’, and the third-person telling ‘robs her of agency’. Where the narrator of the title story speaks for herself, this heroine is spoken about, watched and arranged, and the reader is kept at the same respectful distance as everyone else who admires her.
That distance is the story’s quiet method. Beauty is first seen ‘made all of snow’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), pure and passive and slightly unreal, and the road outside her window lies ‘white and unmarked as a spilled bolt of bridal satin’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), an image that pictures her future marriage as blank fabric waiting to be cut. Her father, who loves her, nonetheless keeps her as a possession, ‘his beauty, his girl-child, his pet’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), and she goes to the Beast feeling herself ‘Miss Lamb, spotless, sacrificial’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon). Set against the fierce first-person Justine-and-Juliette contrast Carter draws across the two Beast tales, this Beauty is the demure, obedient figure, whose consent is really a form of dutifulness.
The danger of the happy ending
Carter is careful not to let us dismiss Beauty as merely weak. ‘Do not think she had no will of her own’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), the narrator insists, and the sentence is doing something clever: the very need to deny it exposes how nearly absent her will is, since her choices are all made for someone else’s sake. The most sceptical touch comes in London, where comfort curdles into vanity and Beauty learns, ‘at the end of her adolescence, how to be a spoiled child’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon). This is not the language of a heroine growing into freedom; it is the language of a woman being domesticated, taught by wealth to prize her own reflection, and Carter lets the near-death of the Beast register as the cost of that self-absorption. The happy ending arrives, but the story has quietly asked whether being loved into a marriage is the same as being liberated.
The sympathetic Beast and a transformation that deflates romance
The Beast is the tenderest male figure in the collection so far, and Carter builds real pathos around his loneliness. He insists on his difference, ‘I am the Beast, and you must call me Beast’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), and the narrator holds that difference open: ‘a lion is a lion and a man is a man’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), a creature of another order entirely, with ‘agate eyes’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) full of a sadness that moves her. He speaks ‘in the diffuse, rumbling purr with which he conversed’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), shy to the point of fearing refusal. Merja Makinen reads this reciprocity, the awe felt on both sides, as the key to Carter’s beast marriages: the lion kisses Beauty’s hand, and she kisses his, so that the transaction is founded on something like equality rather than conquest.
The transformation itself is the story’s wittiest stroke. When Beauty’s love turns the Beast human, he is ‘no longer a lion in her arms but a man’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon), yet not a fairy-tale prince: he has a broken nose ‘such as the noses of retired boxers’, a battered, ordinary face. Carter deflates the expected magical reward, delivering a plausible husband rather than a dream, which cuts against the very romance the tale seems to grant. Whether the ending is a true meeting of equals or a return to the domestic order that the collection elsewhere attacks is a question worth holding open, and it is exactly the tension ‘The Tiger’s Bride’ will answer by refusing to make its heroine human at all.
Key quotations
| Quotation | Method | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| ‘made all of snow’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Metaphor | Establishes Beauty as pure, passive and faintly unreal; the purity is also fragility, an identity that can melt or be shaped by others. |
| ‘the road is white and unmarked as a spilled bolt of bridal satin’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Simile, foreshadowing | Turns the landscape into wedding fabric waiting to be cut, picturing marriage as her blank, predetermined future. |
| ‘his beauty, his girl-child, his pet’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Tricolon, possessive pronouns | The father’s love is also ownership; the repeated ‘his’ shows Beauty passed between men as property before the Beast is ever met. |
| ‘Miss Lamb, spotless, sacrificial’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Metaphor, religious diction | Casts her visit as a willing sacrifice; her virtue is defined by readiness to be given away for her father’s sake. |
| ‘how to be a spoiled child’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Irony | Wealth domesticates rather than frees Beauty; comfort teaches vanity, complicating any reading of the ending as growth. |
| ‘no longer a lion in her arms but a man’ (The Courtship of Mr Lyon) | Transformation, bathos | The magical reward is a plain, broken-nosed man, deflating fairy-tale romance and hinting at a marriage of equals rather than a dream. |
Think it through
- Why tell this story in the third person when the title story and ‘The Tiger’s Bride’ use the first? What does the narrative distance do to our sense of Beauty’s agency?
- ‘Do not think she had no will of her own.’ Does the story earn that claim, or does the need to make it reveal how little will she is allowed?
- Is the transformed Beast, with his ordinary boxer’s face, a reward or a settlement? Does the deflated ending celebrate the marriage or gently question it?
- Compare the reciprocal gestures here (each kisses the other) with the Marquis’s one-way gaze in the title story. How far does mutual awe change the power balance?
Towards the coursework
This story is most useful in the comparative NEA for its treatment of female passivity, duty and the limits of the happy ending. Beauty’s obedience to her father, and her self-image as sacrifice, pairs closely with Nazneen’s early submission and gradual awakening in Brick Lane, letting you compare how each writer measures a woman’s will against family obligation. On fathers and children, the merchant who keeps his daughter as a ‘pet’ speaks to the fraught paternal bonds of The Kite Runner, where love and possession also tangle. And on transformation and belonging, the tale’s cautious, domestic close makes a sharp contrast with the border-dissolving hope of Exit West. A strong essay will treat Carter’s third-person narration itself as a method, not just a fact, and read it against the point of view your chosen novel adopts. Draft the comparison on the coursework page.